I am working on improved xml-rpc fault output because I find the current output from Zope less than useful.

Basically what my version does is strip the html tags from the error value returned from Zope/standard_error_message, formats it in a simple way (basically justs trims line breaks down) and then generates a formatted traceback (if you are in debug mode) as the xml-rpc fault string. If you aren't in debug mode then it just outputs the error type and the formatted value as the fault string.

Now my question is whether this is a good thing in general. I like it especially when accessing Zope using Python's xmlrpclib, but do any of have reasons for keeping the html tags in the fault string?

Thought I would ask before I check this in.

-Casey