[Grok-dev] Re: Pushing for 1.0
janwijbrand at gmail.com
Wed Dec 19 12:36:04 EST 2007
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Tim Terlegård wrote:
>> On Dec 19, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>>> In other words, I think it would be very good to see if we can start
>>> the new year with a 1.0 release of Grok!
>>> What kind of issues do you think we really should address before
>>> going 1.0?
>> What is 1.0 supposed to be, a stable release or something we want to
>> brag to everyone about?
>> In order to brag about this cool grok there are three things I miss:
>> * viewlets
>> * grokproject doing WSGI out of the box
>> * a different security policy where I can put permissions on models
>> instead of views. If I have 4 models and 100 views it may be better to
>> protect the data by putting require on the models instead of the views.
>> But maybe this already works?
> If we're hoping to see wider Grok adoption, I think it needs to be
> possible to 'easy_install grok' and get a working environment, without
> requiring that non-Zope folks learn / use buildout (too much "koolaid"
> for many).
Isn't this covered at least to some extent by grokproject?
It's currently a matter of:
$ easy_install grokproject
$ grokproject MyCoolApp
...answering some questions...
$ cd MyCoolApp
$ ./bin/zopectl start
> That will require tightening up the dependency story further, and
> ensuring that the release of a "stray" egg doesn't make grok uninstallable.
Tightening up the dependency story is good anyway :-)
More information about the Grok-dev