[Grok-dev] Re: Working towards a 0.9 release
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Mon Feb 26 10:07:40 EST 2007
Tim Terlegård wrote:
>> Thanks for volunteering to set up such a site. I think this will be a
>> lot of work. It clearly shouldn't be our top-priority. For 0.9 a
>> simple static page should definitely suffice, for 1.0 we can then
>> think about making something fancier.
> I would agree.
> Would it be too much work to actually use grok for this?
Dunno, I don't think a self-hosted grok website is absolutely necessary,
though it'd be nice at some point.
Perhaps we can get grokwiki to a state where it's actually useful soon
enough. The rest (pages, newsitems, downloads) should be simple enough
to do in grok (heck, who needs a downloads section if we have the
If anybody wants to give this a shot, feel free to do so. I don't think
it'll be relevant for 0.9 or even 1.0, so this can be a long-term
project. Improving Grokwiki would be a first step. For pages/news items,
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/wc.textpage might be some inspiration.
I use this on worldcookery.com. In the end, it'd be nice to have a
buildout that would deploy the grok website. That way we can all play
with it locally till it goes online.
> Isn't 1.0 going
> to have some form of ZMI? Wouldn't that be ok for adding content?
grok already has a simplistic admin interface. I suppose it will be
enhanced a little for application setup, maintenance and possibly
database browsing, but that's it. It will not be a content management
interface. The Zope 2 ZMI does too much and the Zope 3 "ZMI" doesn't
know what it wants to be.
Applications that want to manage content should provide views accordingly.
http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training
Next Zope 3 training at Camp5: http://trizpug.org/boot-camp/camp5
More information about the Grok-dev