[Grok-dev] Request, minor update in the Grok admin

[Sebastian Ware]

Excellent and congratulations! I will fiddle with some of the  
templates and see what I come up with. If it is anything worth showing  
I will send you the updated files.

Mvh Sebastian

22 apr 2008 kl. 12.38 skrev Uli Fouquet:

> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Montag, den 21.04.2008, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ware:
>> Span is intended to be an inline element and div a block  
>> "positioning"
>> element. So you would normally enclose the code you want to position
>> in a div-tag. In this case
>>
>> <div class="ClassPath"><span>zope</span><span>app</span><span>name</
>> span></div>
>>
>> and then the css would be
>>
>> div.ClassPath { positioning stuff... }
>> div.ClassPath span { text formatting and spacing }
>>
>> And if add an ID whenever you have a unique <div> tag in the page you
>> often get the right amount of control but without having millions of
>> id's and class-names to keep track of. A unique div would be the
>> outmost div that holds the collection of attributes, not each div  
>> that
>> encloses an attribute entry.
>
> I thought this was the way, I used 'div' and 'span', except that not
> every 'ClassPath' is enclosed in 'div's, but also in 'h1' or other  
> tags.
> If you want to change it, you might have a look at the view  
> templates in
> ``grok.admin``.
>
> I just got the news, that my Grok introspector improvement project was
> accepted for this year's GSOC :-) Luciano's Flint project was accepted
> too (congratulations, Luciano!).
>
> This means, that the whole introspector stuff will get a rewrite in  
> the
> next months, but I think, that layout changes could be integrated very
> well simultaniously. So I'd propose, that you start with patches for  
> the
> views and we can commit them after a review. If you have committer
> access you can do it yourself (preferably in a branch) or I could do  
> it
> for you. Of course I am willing to help also in other ways, if wanted.
>
> If you do not want to create the patches yourself, this is fine for me
> too. But in this case layout changes have to wait for a later phase of
> the GSOC, when the new implementation of the introspector is working.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -- 
> Uli
>