[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 19 18:18:50 EDT 2008


Hey,

Dirceu Pereira Tiegs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>>  I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
>>  responsibilities:
>>
>>  collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
>>  subclassing/configuration that allows..
>>
>>  collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
>>  collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
>>   in extra dependencies
>>
>>  megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile
> 
> Almost done:
> 
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.namedblobfile/0.1
> http://svn.zope.org/megrok.form/branches/collective.namedblobfile_support
> 
> I will try to finish and release it today.

Excellent, thanks!

Regards,

Martijn



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list