[Grok-dev] Naming of grok.provides
tl at gocept.com
Wed Oct 15 03:18:15 EDT 2008
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> But even with clearer documentation it's still somewhat confusing? Maybe
>> grok.registers is clearer?
> Or grok.register_for(). Consider this example::
> class FooBar(grok.GlobalUtility):
> grok.implements(IBar, IFoo)
I like 'register_for' better as well. How to proceed on this now? Discuss,
write a proposal, just implement it, what about deprecation of the
provides directive? I'm willing to implement the new name if there's
general consent about it.
More information about the Grok-dev