[Grok-dev] No-ZCML story

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Thu Aug 6 13:11:20 EDT 2009


Christian Theune wrote:
> I'm not arguing that we won't need ZCML: I was just pondering whether we 
> could/should get rid of the 4 lines of ZCML that are pure boilerplate to 
> make the initial amount of code as small as possible.

I think that would be valuable, and I'm +0.5 on it. As long as we can 
support the existing usage patterns of ZCML in existing Grok packages 



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list