[Grok-dev] a grok.getApplication() implementation

Kevin Teague kevin at bud.ca
Tue Dec 8 12:29:14 EST 2009

On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:55 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:

> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> The alternative would be to call it get_application(), following  
>>> Grok's
>>> more lower-casey conventions. I think since the parallel with  
>>> getSite()
>>> is so strong here, we should go for getApplication.
>> Ah, my message crossed yours. I hope what I did is ok with you. I  
>> stuck
>> with getApplication() like your suggestion. Even though I liked
>> get_application better initially, I went for the symmetry with  
>> getSite()
>> after all.
> Sounds fine. :)

This all sounds good to me too. I was going to update the docs for  
this today, but I can't see the changes on trunk.

Maybe the merge commit for this didn't complete for some reason?

More information about the Grok-dev mailing list