[Grok-dev] libraries to use with Grok

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Thu Dec 10 17:12:50 EST 2009

Hi there,

Steve Schmechel wrote:
> It is not in the site's navigation yet, because I would like to get 
> some review by others (especially the source authors).

Looks good overall, thanks very much doing this!

A few comments:

Get rid of the "I" in the opening text, and perhaps turn the question 
into a statement:

If we had no namespaces conflicts between library names could easily 
happen. If a developer named their package "resource" there would be a 
good chance some other developer would wish to name their package the 
same way, and without namespaces there would be no way to distinguish 
between the two.

For megrok.*, I think we said "modular extension Grok". of course this 
is a bit of a joke; it's really a "backronym" for caveman-style ME GROK 
HUNGRY and such.

I used the word "stuff" quite a bit. That's a bit informal, perhaps you 
can tighten up the language.

z3c.*: Typo in "diverse colletion" -> "collection"

There's still a reference to Plone mailing lists and such in the 
"Choosing a Namespace for a new Package" section. I'd just turn that 
into grok-dev.



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list