[Grok-dev] a grok.getApplication() implementation

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Mon Nov 30 10:55:55 EST 2009

Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> The alternative would be to call it get_application(), following Grok's 
>> more lower-casey conventions. I think since the parallel with getSite() 
>> is so strong here, we should go for getApplication.
> Ah, my message crossed yours. I hope what I did is ok with you. I stuck 
> with getApplication() like your suggestion. Even though I liked 
> get_application better initially, I went for the symmetry with getSite() 
> after all.

Sounds fine. :)



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list