[Grok-dev] concerns about grokcore.component.provides
gary.poster at gmail.com
Wed Sep 9 11:50:09 EDT 2009
On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> That said, it works well for classes, but less so for functions, for
>> which the adaptation might be looking up an already-existing object
>> (this has existed, though I forget where). Leo's idea, from a
>> following email, is better suited to a theoretical use of adapters,
>> they are used now. I prefer "creates" but then that's because I have
>> an agenda. :-)
> I like 'creates' better too (also better than adapts_to, which I
> came up
> with in my last post).
> Including functions into the discussion was very useful (thanks Leo
> bringing this up). I think however having a look at class decorators
> a future version of Martian might be a more fruitful direction there
> I indicated at the end of my last post).
Yes, I saw that, cool.
I'm not exactly overwhelmed with free time :-) but I feel like I ought
to offer to help. If we get a consensus on "creates" and it is
something you think you can delegate, at least in part, then let me
More information about the Grok-dev