[Grok-dev] Final touches for a 1.0 "proper"

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Tue Sep 29 10:20:30 EDT 2009

Sebastian Ware wrote:
> I believe we still have community documentation that isn't updated.  
> The least we should do is clearly mark them as
>    "This document hasn't been verified with Grok 1.0 and may be  
> outdated."
> Preferably with an explanation on the community docs process and link  
> to the Grok-doc information.
> If we don't do this, it will reflect badly on the great work that has  
> been done. I would argue that this is a show stopper.

So how do we resolve this situation? I'm fine with people marking the 
documentation this way, but you need to organize an effort to do so, 
right? Who is going to organize this?



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list