[Grok-dev] grok.LocalUtility and grok.site()
janwijbrand at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 10:00:37 EST 2011
On 2/23/11 14:13 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> I vaguely remember there's reason for not having the second spelling,
> but I can't recall anymore what it was. Does anyone know?
Answering myself, at least partially:
Features like the "public" flag for local utilities and the "name in
container" and more importantly, overriding registrations in subclasses
of site object seem problematic to implement.
I'm trying anyway of course ;)
More information about the Grok-dev