[Gsoc] proposal suggestions

[Lennart Regebro]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Uli Fouquet <uli at gnufix.de> wrote:
>  Welcome, Number Three ;-) The problem is in fact, that every single
>  proposal focuses on a different environment: plain Zope2/Plone (Martin
>  Lundwall), Grok (my propsal) and Zope 3 (your proposal) and that all
>  should share a certain amount of code.

Also, your proposal concentrates on the
object-inspector/documentation-viewer, while Martin and Jespers
proposal is about the component registry. These are not technically
overlapping, very much, but integration would be very useful, so that
you can go from the object inspector to the component registry, and
back with the click of a button.

>  Hmm, overall we might cope best, if I stick on the docgrok to do
>  introspecting, while Martin could build the base for (better) future
>  introspectors and Jesper might concentrate on the improved PAU interface
>  for Grok. What do you think?

Martin is concentrating on the component registry introspector, so
Jesper might look at building the base for better object inspectors,
and Uli on the documentation tool?

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64