[Zope-CMF] Re: [CMF 2.1] PersistentComponents is not enough

Philipp von Weitershausen philipp at weitershausen.de
Mon Jan 8 17:48:55 EST 2007


Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> CMF won't come eggified for this release, that work has stalled.
> 
> whit wrote:
>> plone's egg story looks non-existent until next release.
> 
> Right, I figued as much. Also, it's only for Zope 2.11 that we can 
> actually tackle sensible egg support in the Zope 2 core, so that makes 
> more sense anyway.
> 
> I see three options:
> 
> a) somehow bundle CMF 2.1 (and Plone 3) with a package called 
> five.localsitemanager. Given that Plone 3 already has plone.* packages 
> (and I assume they also want five.customerize), this might probably be 
> less of an issue for Plone than for the CMF.
> 
> b) make Five 1.6 and have that include five.localsitemanager. I would 
> *rather* not like to do that...
> 
> c) create Products.FiveLocalSiteManager, or perhaps 
> Products.LocalSiteManager. Yet another product *sigh*. OTOH, that might 
> not be such a problem since I envision products to become eggs in Zope 
> 2.11...

Of course, whatever we decide to do, the result really should ship with 
Zope 2.11. It's already sort of a crime that we don't do this in Zope 
2.10 yet. Even worse, Five itself is creating sites w/ 
PersistentComponents :(.


-- 
http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training
2nd edition of Web Component Development with Zope 3 is now shipping!



More information about the Zope-CMF mailing list