[Zope-CMF] CMF vs. CMF.buildout
jens at dataflake.org
Thu Aug 5 11:02:26 EDT 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 8/5/10 16:52 , yuppie wrote:
> Charlie Clark wrote:
>> I'm actively abstaining as while I understand the need to clean things up,
>> I'm not sure I understand the whole context (my lack of understanding
>> rather than any lack of explanation). CMF is actually empty, isn't it?
>> Apart from the history that is.
> And these files might still contain some useful information, but need to
> be cleaned up:
> - INSTALL.txt and INSTALL_SVN.txt
> - README.txt
You do realize if you're trying to create one "supported" buildout for
developers and end users there's a new support burden to shoulder.
CMF.buildout was explicitly billed as a developer convenience. What's it
going to be for a central CMF package?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-CMF