[Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

Chris McDonough chrism@digicool.com
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 07:02:50 -0500


> Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg
> FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient)

Actually, it's the other way around.  OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times slower
than FileStorage on writes.  Reads are slow too but the slowness is somewhat
negated by caching.