[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] zLOG is dead

[Andreas Jung]

--On Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 16:45 Uhr +0200 Andreas Jung 
<andreas at andreas-jung.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 10:57 Uhr +0200 Lennart Regebro
> <regebro at nuxeo.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "Andreas Jung" <andreas at andreas-jung.com>
>>> When I look through the Zope HEAD code then you are using e.g.
>>> 'zodb.conn' or 'zodb.storage' but also 'Zope' as loggername. Do we
>>> have to agree on some common usage of the logger names?
>>> E.g. for logging calls in the reST package....better using 'Zope' or
>> 'reST'?
>>
>>  'reST' I guess is the onbious one. I would like to see something like
>> this:
>>
>> For Zope core core:
>> Zope.subsystem. i.e. 'Zope.Accesscontrol', 'Zope.OFS'.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> For the default lib/python/Product stuff:
>> Either Zope.Product or just Product, ie 'MailHost' or 'Zope.MailHost'.
>> Which I don't care, makes no matter for me, but consistency would be
>> good.
>
> For consitency: Zope.Products.XXXX
> For lazy writers: Zope. XXXXX
>
> I prefer the second solution...everyone should know what are products and
> what
> are packages. In fact the name does not matter because you can see in the
> traceback
> where the error occurs. You don't get this information from the name
> directly.

Of course this applies only if you have an error :-) Anyway....names should 
be
kept as short as possible.

-aj