[Zope-dev] coverage.py, profile and hotshot support in Zope's
jim at zope.com
Mon Aug 22 15:01:11 EDT 2005
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
>> | I have added support for coverage analysis using coverage.py from
>> Gareth | Rees and Ned Batchelder, as well as support for profiling
>> using either the | profile or hotshot modules from the Python standard
>> library, to Zope 2's | test runner test.py.
>> | | Justification:
>> | | - coverage.py will let you interactively focus on the modules you
>> want to | check for coverage.
>> | | - profile is slow to collect data but quick for analysis.
>> | | - hotshot is fast when collecting but very slow for analysis. On
>> the other | hand, one can feed the great KCacheGrind tool with hotshot
>> data after some | transformation and this is the best way I have found
>> so far for | interactively exploring profile data.
>> Eerm, the test runner in Zope 2 is the same from Zope 3. The version
>> in Zope 3 X3.0 has profile support using hotshot and coverage support
>> using the trace.py module, but the version in Zope 2 is earlier than
>> How does that differ from what you're proposing?
> 1. I haven't found hotshot support in either Zope 2.8.1 nor the TRUNK.
> 2. Has I wrote, coverage.py can be used interactively (at least, from
> the command line) to focus on whichever package you are working on at
> the moment. You can also collect data from several runs, which is useful
> for us because we have to test each CPS package in a different run.
> 3. I understand that trace.py and coverage.py have some overlap, and
> should probably be merged into one great and up to date coverage tool.
> But before it is done, I find useful to have both tools at our disposal.
> 4. Same for hotshot and profile. Both are useful.
I don't think Sidnei was questioning the value of these, but
just pointing out that another version of the test runner already had
some of this.
I'll note that I'm working on a newer test runner that I hope to use
in Zope 2.9 and 3.2. The new test runner is a nearly complete rewrite to
- A more flexible test runner that can be used for a variety of projects.
The current test runner has been forked for ZODB, Zope 3, and Zope 2.
That's why the Zope 3 version has features that are lacking in the Zope 2
- Support for "layers" of tests, so that it can handle unit tests and
- A slightly better UI.
- Tests (of the test runner itself :)
I'd like to include coverage and profiling support. (There is partial support
now, but untested.) Wanna help?
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Zope-Dev