[Zope-dev] Re: OFS.Application deprecations for Zope 2.10

Chris McDonough chrism at plope.com
Mon Jun 12 09:09:35 EDT 2006


Right, sorry.  I've been out of the loop.  I haven't been keeping up  
with the latest goings on.

FWIW, I recently needed to emulate this machinery for "Basket" so I  
can sympathize with wanting to make it saner, but I question the  
wisdom of deprecating 'methods'.

IMHO, we should ignore the fact that the lookup for "methods" attrs  
comes after the comment that says "Support old-style product  
metadata".  registerClass does not provide an automated way to do  
what "methods" does.  The "new regime" way to do what it does would  
be to use a Five view, but this wouldn't work for non-URL lookups.   
So people who use 'methods' now will need to monkeypatch in hideous  
ways just like the 'methods' stuff does now, in which case why not  
leave it?

- C

On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:57 AM, yuppie wrote:

> Hi Chris!
>
>
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Jusst out of curiosity, what is the rationale for deprecating  
>> "methods"?
>
> It has been deprecated for at least 6 years now, I just added the  
> warnings last year.
>
> I don't know the old discussions, but the comments added here make  
> pretty clear that initialize() was meant to replace  
> '__ac_permissions__', 'meta_types' and 'methods':
> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/Application.py? 
> r1=18170&r2=18185
>
> I guess 'methods' was never meant to be used for something else  
> than factory methods.
>
> As Florent already pointed out using it for general monkey patching  
> doesn't look like a good idea. We only can improve the product  
> initialization if we first remove some cruft.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> 	Yuppie
>



More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list