[Zope-dev] Re: straighting out the SQLAlchemy integration mess

Martin Aspeli optilude at gmx.net
Wed Apr 9 20:56:43 EDT 2008


Laurence Rowe wrote:

> Should one phase commit be set as the default to make it easier to work 
> with sqlite (and mssql)? Probably yes.

Ideally we'd guess based on the URL scheme but allow it to be set 
explicitly, IMHO. Single phase would be the fallback, I guess.

> Should the default be for sessions to start out `active` or `dirty`? If 
> they start out `dirty` then existing 1.0 code should work as before.

What are the implications of having them start out dirty?

> It'll probably be next week before I manage to get this tidied up and 
> merged back to trunk.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book



More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list