[Zope-dev] Re: paver: buildout is utterly doomed

[Martin Aspeli]

Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Christian Theune <ct at gocept.com> wrote:
> [buildout.org versus buildout.zope.org]
>>  > Agreed, we shouldn't hide ourselves. I think *.python.org is a step
>>  > too far. What I do think is that it's good to let projects that *do*
>>  > stand on their own stand alone in their presentation as well. That's
>>  > not about hiding ourselves, it's about giving the right impression to
>>  > people.
>>
>>  True. Considering that the current zope.org effort hopefully won't die (when
>>  are we going to go live? Is there something like a check list or road map?)
> 
> I'm not in charge of the zope.org project, but this is a good
> question. I've cc-ed Martin.

As soon as we have content to cover at least the basics of each of our 
major projects (Zope 2, Zope 3, CMF, ZODB... and maybe zc.buildout)?

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book