[Zope-dev] Re: Zope3 on Google AppEngine

[David Pratt]

Hi Malthe. z3c.dobbin looks quite good and transparent. In my opinion, 
this is much closer to what integration ought to look like for CA. BTW, 
I noticed that z3c.dobbin is zpl but ore.alchemist that it depends on is 
gpl. I think all the other zope flavors of sqlalchemy are under zpl. I 
believe there was a recent effort to bring the sqlalchemy flavors 
together under a single package. Not sure what progress has been made.

In any case, this direction looks like a good one. It would be 
interesting if dobbin could map for storm but it appears to rely heavily 
upon ore.alchemist. I believe storms advantage is that it is faster than 
sqlalchemy since it doesn't have to worry about pooling connections, 
mappers, and more.  I'd be interesting to see a similar approach with 
storm. Good job on this.

Regards,
David

Malthe Borch wrote:
> David Pratt wrote:
>> Hi Jodok. I had looked at storm a while back but the zope integration 
>> seemed to lack any relationship with zope schemas.  I guess it is 
>> possible to define a zope schema that is not persisted and create the 
>> tables from it. It did not seem to me a good way of using CA. How are 
>> you managing this part of things.
> 
> fwiw, ore.alchemist and now z3c.dobbin integrates zope.interface and 
> zope.schema with sqlalchemy, each taking a quite different approach.
> 
> \malthe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>