[Zope-dev] Status of github migration

Gauthier Bastien gauthier at imio.be
Thu Jan 31 09:11:19 UTC 2013


Hi everybody,

I made what necessary for z3c.soap to comply with the zope project 
policy (used zope.repositorypolicy) and incindentally to work with Zope 
2.13.19, what is the process now so it is migrated to Github?

Thank you and have a nice day,

	

Gauthier Bastien
Support IMIO - CommunesPlone
rue de la Vieille Sambre 34
5190 Mornimont
Tél: +32(0)71 780979

Disclaimer

Les informations contenues dans ce courrier électronique (annexes 
incluses) sont confidentielles et réservées à l'usage exclusif des 
destinataires repris ci-dessus. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire, 
soyez informé par la présente que vous ne pouvez ni divulguer, ni 
reproduire, ni faire usage de ces informations pour vous-même ou toute 
tierce personne. Si vous avez reçu ce courrier électronique par erreur, 
vous êtes prié d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et d'effacer le 
message e-mail de votre ordinateur.

De informatie in deze e-mail, bijlagen inbegrepen, is vertrouwelijk en 
is als dus danig voorbehouden voor exclusief gebruik door de hierboven 
vermelde bestemmeling(en). Indien u niet de bestemmeling bent, willen 
wij u erop wijzen dat u deze informatie niet mag aanwenden voor eigen 
gebruik noch verspreiden aan derden. Indien u deze e-mail per ongeluk 
hebt ontvangen, gelieve de afzender onmiddellijk te verwittigen en deze 
e-mail van uw computer te verwijderen.

The information contained in this e-mail and the annexed documents is 
confidential and exclusively available to the here above mentioned 
addressee(s).Should you not be the addressee, please be informed that 
you may neither disclose nor reproduce this e-mail, nor may the 
information contained in this e-mail and its eventually annexed 
documents be used by yourself or by a third party. If you erroneously 
received this e-mail, could you kindly and immediately inform the 
addresser and delete the message on your computer.

Le 11/01/13 16:42, Jim Fulton a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/10/2013 06:10 PM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
>>
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>>> What is needed is not scripts, but eyeballs:  we need people who
>>>> know the various packages and*care*  about getting them migrated to
>>>> github to step up.  Softwward which doesn't have a champion willing
>>>> to do the work should stay behind on SVN.
>>> The community as a whole cares about having them all migrated to
>>> github. I'm sure this will happen the next time there's a sprint, just
>>> like lots of them got migrated (and subsequently deleted) at the zope4
>>> sprint in San Francisco a few years back.
>> The communite as-a-whole demonstrably does *not* care about many of the
>> projects on svn.zope.org.  E.g.:
>>
>>   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-January/070977.html
>>
>>> We need man-hours, sure, but not champions. Being blocked on working
>>> on the code because you're the first one to care about a package and
>>> subsequently have to learn how to do the migration is a crazy way of
>>> doing things.
>> The foundation agreed to support moving projects to github, but that
>> isn't a blank check.  For instance, if there is substantial interest in
>> having the projects pulled in by the current Plone buildout moved, make a
>> list of them, and recruit the folks to step up and help with the
>> migration for them.  The effort requires includes doing the conversion,
>> checking the results *by hand*, landing the repository, and fixing
>> anything that breaks once you do (including stuff that breaks in projects
>> you otherwise don't care about).
>>
>> Any project that can't find somebody willing to do that work (that is
>> what I meant by a "champion") is better off staying on SVN:  we don't do
>> ourselves favors by carrying all the unmaintained baggage of fifteen
>> years worth of development forward, just for "purity" / completeness /
>> whatever.
> +1
>
> BTW (speaking of cruft), as someone who used/abused svn.zope.org as a
> generic open-source hosting service (when I should have used something
> like code.google.com, or bitbucket, or whatever), I wonder if there
> should be a process for petitioning to remove projects from the ZF
> repositories. (Maybe this only applies to me :)
>
> Jim
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20130131/bbf3fdcb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: images1
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2611 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20130131/bbf3fdcb/attachment.jpe>


More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list