[Zope-PAS] Id mangling.
zbir at urbanape.com
Thu Sep 9 12:17:59 EDT 2004
On Sep 9, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Zachery Bir wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2004, at 12:11 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> Zachery Bir wrote:
>>> As it currently stands, there can be perfectly valid arguments for
>>> the plugin prefix to be based on either the authenticator or the
>> Really? What would the argument for letting the prefix be the
>> authenticator be? I can't see any use case for that...
> A PAS set-up with no enumerators.
> Zope authenticates against the credentials vetted by an upstream
> authentication system.
> Like I said, our current Shibboleth authentication system does just
> this. All requests coming into Zope are pre-vetted by Shibboleth, Zope
> just accepts the credentials, without requiring an enumerator.
In any case, it's quickly becoming moot. We'll be revamping the
More information about the Zope-PAS