[Zope] Proposal: Include tino's patched <dtml-in> in future Zope

Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:36:15 +0000


On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:28:34 +1100, Itai Tavor <itai@optusnet.com.au>
wrote:

>Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:56:17 +1100, Itai Tavor <itai@optusnet.com.au>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>citing some irrelevant concern about polluting the namespace.
>>
>>namespace pollution is less serious if you have a greater number of
>>namespaces, and more serious if you have fewer.
>>
>>dtml is the only language I know which only provides *one* namespace.

>Ok, so namespace pollution might be a valid argument against the=20
>prefix patch. But as Chris and Tino pointed out, it's irrelevant for=20
>sequence_xxx - and that's the patch that has been repeatedly=20
>requested on the list and rejected by DC.

No, ethe prefix option is optional pollution. As Tino pointed out,
that is as much or as little of a problem as you want it to be.

Adding underscore in addition to hyphen separated names is forced
pollution. As Tino pointed out, the hyphen-separated part of the
namespace enjoys less protection that I had been assuming, so the
magnitude of the problem is less, but definitely non-zero



Toby Dickenson
tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com