binbrain at gmail.com
Fri Dec 25 08:21:17 EST 2009
So far I had just tried developing a site and allow it to be Added and
Viewed in the ZMI.
In the Z2.12 instance/etc/site.zcml I have...
In the browser dir I put a configure.zcml.
ConfigurationError: ('Unknown directive', u'
So containerView is declared in
and I proceeded to just add it etc/site.zcml. That's when I noticed that the
package-includes were by in large missing. At least it looks that way.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <jens at dataflake.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Jim Pharis wrote:
> > Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though
> > is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA
> goodness, I
> > still can't easily develop using those methods. So I'm left leaving this
> > conversation thinking that I'm back to developing Products using the
> > esoteric manage_* methods, even in 2.12.
> The component architecture is fully entrenched within Zope 2.12 and you
> can use it just like you were able to use it in Zope 3. However, since
> the ZTK is not Zope 3, you won't have all Zope 3 facilities available,
> that's a fact of life. Why you conclude that you're somehow forced to
> use "esoteric manage_* methods" I am note sure.
> Maybe someone can help if you mention specific code where you think you
> cannot develop the Zope 3 way.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Zope maillist - Zope at zope.org
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Zope