[Zope3-Users] IContentType: interface implements another interface
sakesun at boonthavorn.com
Thu May 26 03:46:14 EDT 2005
We do not have to implement any interface that *extends* from
IContentType in order to make a class become a content.
class IMyContent(Interface): pass
In zcml we do declare:
I wonder what exactly does specifying "type" attribute do. Somehow,
Zope will have to attach IContentType to IMyContent.
In which case, I see no possibility to do that beside using
"directyProvides". But the docstring says "implements" rather than
"provides" as I thought it should be.
What I missed here ?
Leeuw van der, Tim wrote:
>In java-terms you'd say that one interface *extends* another interface, rather than implements. But I guess this wording is because Python doesn't have interfaces, and therefore in your class-definition you might not see the difference?
> """This interface represents a content type.
> If an **interface** implements this interface type, then all object
> implementing the interface are considered content objects.
>How can an interface implements IContentType ? (or whatever interface)
>Isn't the term "provides" should be used rather than "implements" ?
More information about the Zope3-users