[ZPT] Mini proposal: repeat-define and repeat-condition

[Casey Duncan]

On Friday 24 January 2003 02:06 pm, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Casey Duncan wrote at 2003-1-23 10:24 -0500:
>  > Here's a counter-proposal that I think might combine both of yours a=
nd so
>  > lve=20
>  > the backward compatibility issue:
>  >=20
>  > Invent a new repeat tag that happens first and leave the existing re=
peat=20
>  > tag=20
>  > alone.
> I like this proposal.
>=20
> One minor problem: how do old and new repeat tag interact with one anot=
her.
> Probably, we can forbid that both occur on the same tag.
>=20
>=20
> Dieter

Yes, I had a similar thought. Otherwise the behavior would be difficult t=
o=20
define.

-Casey