[Zope-Coders] Proposal: put i18n into 2.6

[Shane Hathaway]

Jeremy Hylton wrote:
>>>>>>"AJ" == Andreas Jung <andreas@andreas-jung.com> writes:
>>>>>
> 
>   AJ> From the maintenance point of view it is hard to keep
>   AJ> an overview over at for different code lines (2.5.X, 2.6, 2.7,
>   AJ> HEAD). Fixing bugs and backporting fixes to other branches will
>   AJ> become more complex and requires more time.  I would like to see
>   AJ> the number of different active branches as low as possible.
> 
> Excellent point, Andreas.
> 
> We just cut a ZODB3 beta release, which means we just created a
> ZODB3-3_1-branch for this release.  There are a bunch of important bug
> fixes in this release that I wanted to backport to Zope 2.5.  I hadn't
> thought about it before, but do I need to also backport them to Zope
> 2.6 and Zope 2.7?  That's really an excessive amount of work!

I understood that the 2_7 branch would be merged into the head.  I hope 
that happens soon.

You guys (PythonLabs, Zope community, Zope Corp., and other 
contributors) are just so creative.  You come up with so many ideas and 
clean implementations that it's hard to manage the innovation.  Cut it 
out!  STOP BEING SO SMART!

(Just kidding. ;-)

Shane