[Grok-dev] Re: Pushing for 1.0
tseaver at palladion.com
Wed Dec 19 11:48:28 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tim Terlegård wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> In other words, I think it would be very good to see if we can start
>> the new year with a 1.0 release of Grok!
>> What kind of issues do you think we really should address before
>> going 1.0?
> What is 1.0 supposed to be, a stable release or something we want to
> brag to everyone about?
> In order to brag about this cool grok there are three things I miss:
> * viewlets
> * grokproject doing WSGI out of the box
> * a different security policy where I can put permissions on models
> instead of views. If I have 4 models and 100 views it may be better to
> protect the data by putting require on the models instead of the views.
> But maybe this already works?
If we're hoping to see wider Grok adoption, I think it needs to be
possible to 'easy_install grok' and get a working environment, without
requiring that non-Zope folks learn / use buildout (too much "koolaid"
That will require tightening up the dependency story further, and
ensuring that the release of a "stray" egg doesn't make grok uninstallable.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Grok-dev