[Grok-dev] a grok.getApplication() implementation

Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbrand at gmail.com
Mon Nov 30 06:27:11 EST 2009

Martijn Faassen wrote:
> The alternative would be to call it get_application(), following Grok's 
> more lower-casey conventions. I think since the parallel with getSite() 
> is so strong here, we should go for getApplication.

Ah, my message crossed yours. I hope what I did is ok with you. I stuck 
with getApplication() like your suggestion. Even though I liked 
get_application better initially, I went for the symmetry with getSite() 
after all.


More information about the Grok-dev mailing list