[Grok-dev] post 1.0 Grok development wishlist
optilude+lists at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 07:03:43 EDT 2009
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> * related to this, exploring a step towards more explicit directives,
> less implicit rules. We could experiment with a megrok.explicit
> extension which requires a lot more directives to be present.
What are the benefits of this? What type of changes would this involve?
> * ZTK integration. Grok and grokcore.* should use the ZTK packages, not
> Zope 3.4 anymore.
This is the one I find most exciting. :) Getting Grok onto ZTK would
hopefully inject some more momentum into the ZTK effort, and make it
easier to re-use components across Grok, five.grok, Plone and other
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
More information about the Grok-dev