[ZWeb] DNS still fishy?

Jens Vagelpohl jens at dataflake.org
Thu Oct 12 09:05:14 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 12 Oct 2006, at 08:57, Justizin wrote:
> Anyway, everything except these hosts need to be removed from the  
> rotation:
>
>  ns1.zoneedit.com
>  ns7.zoneedit.com
>  ns.qutang.net
>  ns*.zope.com

Then I suggest you do that and end the current confusion in regards  
to which server does what (and which server even has the correct data).


> I'd love to see more backups once they have copies of the zone.  If
> you want to grab a copy of the zone, you'll have to transfer manually
> from ns1.zoneedit.com or ns7.zoneedit.com, from one of these IP
> addresses:

No you don't. Setting a machine up as a slave, in that terrible bind- 
centric world, will cause it to pull the data automatically.


> Three nameservers is fine for now.  Eight would be far better.

I still don't understand why we would need that many...  but I don't  
want to discuss this any further. Matter of fact, since zoneedit does  
not support NOTIFY it is probably a bad thing to even have my server  
on the list. I suggest you limit the official servers to the ones you  
mentioned, the zoneedit/qutang/zope.com hosts until NOTIFY is working.

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFLj2KRAx5nvEhZLIRAvd9AJ9kNgz+oq14VqEW9AZsyHrirQmcbgCfRyTm
DrDo2moe+MzVKW1XNIeGXsI=
=TgXr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Zope-web mailing list